Collective attention and ranking methods

نویسنده

  • Gabrielle DEMANGE
چکیده

Ranking systems are becoming increasingly important in many areas, in the Web environment and academic life for instance. Presumably a ranking helps individuals to make decisions by providing them with relevant information. In a world with a tremendous amount of choices, a ranking plays also the crucial role of influencing the attention that is devoted to the various alternatives. In recurrent situations, attention will, in turn, alter the new statements on which subsequent rankings will be based. The paper proposes an analysis of this feedback by studying some reasonable dynamics that a ranking method may induce. The feedback is shown to depend strongly on the used ranking method. Two main families of methods are investigated, one based on the notion of ’handicaps’, the other one on the notion of peers’ rankings.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Social Values at the Interface: Toward “Just” Human-Computer Ranking Designs at Scale

In the design of human-computer ranking systems for the adaptive display of information, designers often define a domain-specific scoring function which maps items such as people or information search results to numeric scores. Classic ranking systems typically display these items in a linear fashion, sorted by score. There are shortcomings to this approach: such ranking systems do not provide ...

متن کامل

The Accuracy of Collective Decision Rules in a Noisy and Corrupt Environment

How do noise and bribery affect the accuracy of collective decision rules? This paper presents simulation results that measure the accuracy of ten well known collective decision rules under noise and bribery. When noise is low these rules can be divided into accurate ("good") and inaccurate ("bad") groups. The bad rules' accuracy improves, sometimes significantly, when noise increases while the...

متن کامل

Cognitive Heuristics and Collective Opinions in Peer Recommendation

The world presents far more information than people have the capacity to examine. As a result, humans have evolved to use cognitive heuristics to decide quickly what information to pay attention to. For example, people pay more attention to items near the top of a list than those below [Payne 1951]. A consequence of this cognitive heuristic, called position bias, is the strong effect the presen...

متن کامل

An Investigation of Collective Teacher Efficacy and Teacher Self-Efficacy Subscales in the EFL Context of Iran

The concept of teacher efficacy has received significant attention in educational contexts in the recent years and has been empirically probed at 2 levels: individual teacher efficacy and collective teacher efficacy. Having their origins in the social cognitive theory, teacher and collective efficacy perceptions are quite distinct constructs, each affecting educational decisions and student ach...

متن کامل

The Crisis Management of Enterprise's Collective Brain Drain

This paper take enterprise's collective brain drain as the research object, by using of questionnaire method, historical data, experts consultation method, and other methods of construct the collective brain drain of forewarning indicators, and then use the alternative ranking method to determine and evaluate comprehensively system of indicators to the weight. By constructing the forewarning sy...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010